Key Differences
In short — Core i7-14700F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-3450S on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-3450S is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-14700F is 4271 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-3450S.
Advantages of Core i5-3450S
- Up to 70% cheaper than Core i7-14700F - $77.48 vs $256.76
- Up to 33% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than Core i7-14700F - $0.31 vs $0.46 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-14700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i7-14700F
- Performs up to 121% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Core i5-3450S - 558 vs 253 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3450S - 28 vs 4 threads
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
FPS
253
45%
Value, €/FPS
€0.31/FPS
100%
Price, €
€77.48
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €77.48 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 437 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
558
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.46/FPS
67%
Price, €
€256.76
30%
FPS Winner
Buy for €256.76 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 436 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-3450S | vs | Core i7-14700F |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 20 |
4 | Threads | 28 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |