In Battlefield 6, the Core i5-3450 is much slower than the Ryzen 9 7950X3D. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i5-3450
- Consumes up to 36% less energy – 77 vs 120 Watts
- Consumes up to 36% less energy
Ryzen 9 7950X3D
- Up to 156% faster in Battlefield 6 – 159 vs 62 FPS
- Up to 156% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 10 years and 8 months newer – Jan 04, 2023 vs Apr 29, 2012
- Is 10 years and 8 months newer
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Core i5-3450 vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D: Comparison of performance and price
Core i5-3450
Apr 29th, 2012
Average FPS
62 FPS
39%
Min 1% FPS
46 FPS
39%
Price, $
$95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.53/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-3450 vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-3450 vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-3450
Apr 29th, 2012
Cores
4-core
25%
L3 Cache
6 MB
5%
Base Frequency
3.1 GHz
74%
Turbo Frequency
3.5 GHz
61%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
31%
Ryzen 9 7950X3D
Jan 4th, 2023
Cores
16-core
100%
L3 Cache
128 MB
100%
Base Frequency
4.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-3450 Apr 29th, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 9 7950X3D Jan 4th, 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Apr 29th, 2012 | Released | Jan 4th, 2023 |
$174.00 | MSRP | $699.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1155 | Socket | AM5 |
77 W | Power Consumption | 120 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1600 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 5200 MHz (DDR5) |
| Intel HD 2500 | Integrated GPU | Radeon Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
