In Battlefield 6, the Core i5-3320M is much slower than the Core i9-14900K. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $388 cheaper!
Core i5-3320M
- Up to 86% cheaper – $65.05 vs $452.68
- Up to 86% cheaper
- Up to 68% better value in Battlefield 6 – $1.06 vs $3.32/FPS
- Up to 68% better value in Battlefield 6
- Consumes up to 72% less energy – 35 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 72% less energy
Core i9-14900K
- Up to 123% faster in Battlefield 6 – 136 vs 61 FPS
- Up to 123% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 11 years and 4 months newer – Oct 17, 2023 vs Jun 01, 2012
- Is 11 years and 4 months newer
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Core i5-3320M vs Core i9-14900K: Comparison of performance and price
Core i5-3320M
Jun 1st, 2012
Average FPS
61 FPS
45%
Min 1% FPS
46 FPS
45%
Price, $
$65.05
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.06/FPS
100%
Core i9-14900K
Oct 17th, 2023
Average FPS
136 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
102 FPS
100%
Price, $
$452.68
14%
Value, $/FPS
$3.32/FPS
32%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-3320M vs Core i9-14900K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-3320M vs Core i9-14900K in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-3320M
Jun 1st, 2012
Cores
2-core
8%
L3 Cache
3 MB
8%
Base Frequency
2.6 GHz
81%
Turbo Frequency
3.3 GHz
55%
Max. unknown RAM Speed
MHz
Core i9-14900K
Oct 17th, 2023
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-3320M Jun 1st, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-14900K Oct 17th, 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 1st, 2012 | Released | Oct 17th, 2023 |
| – | MSRP | $589.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | LGA1700 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| unknown | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
| Intel HD 4000 | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 770 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
