In Battlefield 6, the Core i5-3320M is quite a bit slower than the Core i5-12600K. However, it's a better value for money, as it's $119 cheaper!
Core i5-3320M
- Up to 65% cheaper – $65.05 vs $184.46
- Up to 65% cheaper
- Up to 35% better value in Battlefield 6 – $1.06 vs $1.64/FPS
- Up to 35% better value in Battlefield 6
- Consumes up to 72% less energy – 35 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 72% less energy
Core i5-12600K
- Up to 84% faster in Battlefield 6 – 112 vs 61 FPS
- Up to 84% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 9 years and 5 months newer – Nov 04, 2021 vs Jun 01, 2012
- Is 9 years and 5 months newer
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Core i5-3320M vs Core i5-12600K: Comparison of performance and price
Core i5-3320M
Jun 1st, 2012
Average FPS
61 FPS
54%
Min 1% FPS
46 FPS
55%
Price, $
$65.05
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.06/FPS
100%
Core i5-12600K
Nov 4th, 2021
Average FPS
112 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
84 FPS
100%
Price, $
$184.46
35%
Value, $/FPS
$1.64/FPS
65%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-3320M vs Core i5-12600K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-3320M vs Core i5-12600K in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-3320M
Jun 1st, 2012
Cores
2-core
20%
L3 Cache
3 MB
15%
Base Frequency
2.6 GHz
70%
Turbo Frequency
3.3 GHz
67%
Max. unknown RAM Speed
MHz
Core i5-12600K
Nov 4th, 2021
Cores
10-core
100%
L3 Cache
20 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.9 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-3320M Jun 1st, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-12600K Nov 4th, 2021 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 1st, 2012 | Released | Nov 4th, 2021 |
| – | MSRP | $289.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | LGA1700 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| unknown | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) |
| Intel HD 4000 | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 770 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
