The Core i5-3320M is at least 2x slower gaming CPU than the Core i3-9100F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Core i5-3320M
- Consumes up to 46% less energy – 35 vs 65 Watts
- Has an integrated GPU, while the Core i3-9100F cannot run games without a dedicated GPU
Advantages of the Core i3-9100F
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
Core i5-3320M vs Core i3-9100F for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i5-3320M
Jun 1st, 2012
Average FPS
168
90%
Min 1% FPS
113
92%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Core i3-9100F
Apr 23rd, 2019
Average FPS
186
100%
Min 1% FPS
123
100%
Price, €
€95.67
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.51/FPS
100%
Core i5-3320M vs Core i3-9100F in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-3320M vs Core i3-9100F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-3320M vs Core i3-9100F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-3320M
Jun 1st, 2012
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
3 MB
50%
Base Frequency
2.6 GHz
72%
Turbo Frequency
3.3 GHz
79%
Max. unknown RAM Speed
MHz
Core i3-9100F
Apr 23rd, 2019
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i5-3320M | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i3-9100F |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $122.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
35 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Performance | ||
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 4 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.6 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.6 GHz |
| 3.3 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 4.2 GHz |
| 3 MB | L3 Cache | 6 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| unknown | RAM | DDR4 @ 2400 MHz |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | No |
| No | Overclockable | No |
