Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X outperforms the cheaper Core i5-2550K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-2550K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X is 3893 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-2550K.
Advantages of Core i5-2550K
- Up to 86% cheaper than Ryzen 9 7950X - $56.81 vs $405.65
- Up to 82% better value when playing No Man's Sky than Ryzen 9 7950X - $0.39 vs $2.11 per FPS
- Consumes up to 44% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7950X - 95 vs 170 Watts
Advantages of Ryzen 9 7950X
- Performs up to 32% better in No Man's Sky than Core i5-2550K - 213 vs 161 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-2550K - 32 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-2550K doesn't have integrated graphics
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 30th, 2012
FPS
161
76%
Value, €/FPS
€0.39/FPS
100%
Price, €
€63.06
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €63.06 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
213
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.11/FPS
18%
Price, €
€450.27
14%
FPS Winner
Buy for €450.27 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 84 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 30th, 2012
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-2550K | vs | Ryzen 9 7950X |
---|---|---|
Jan 30th, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.7 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 170 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 45.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |