Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-2500K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-2500K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13400F is 4378 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-2500K.
Advantages of Core i5-2500K
- Up to 81% cheaper than Core i5-13400F - $146.88 vs $765.76
- Up to 77% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i5-13400F - $0.86 vs $3.72 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-13400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 20% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i5-2500K - 206 vs 171 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-2500K - 16 vs 4 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
FPS
171
83%
Value, €/FPS
€0.86/FPS
100%
Price, €
€146.88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €146.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6617 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
206
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.72/FPS
23%
Price, €
€765.76
19%
FPS Winner
Buy for €765.76 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6617 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-2500K | vs | Core i5-13400F |
---|---|---|
Jan 9th, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
95 W | TDP | Not Available |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |