Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X3D outperforms the cheaper Core i5-2400S on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-2400S is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X3D is 4378 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-2400S.
Advantages of Core i5-2400S
- Up to 92% cheaper than Ryzen 9 7950X3D - $48.69 vs $604.65
- Up to 92% better value when playing Control than Ryzen 9 7950X3D - $0.27 vs $3.23 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D - 65 vs 120 Watts
Advantages of Ryzen 9 7950X3D
- Performs up to 5% better in Control than Core i5-2400S - 208 vs 199 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-2400S - 32 vs 4 threads
Control
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
FPS
199
96%
Value, €/FPS
€0.27/FPS
100%
Price, €
€54.05
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €54.05 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 252 minutes ago
Buy for €671.16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 252 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-2400S | vs | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
---|---|---|
Jan 9th, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.7 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 120 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
Intel HD 2000 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |