Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900KF outperforms the cheaper Core i5-2400S on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-2400S is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900KF is 4664 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-2400S.
Advantages of Core i5-2400S
- Up to 86% cheaper than Core i9-14900KF - $48.69 vs $338.95
- Up to 83% better value when playing Deathloop than Core i9-14900KF - $0.32 vs $1.83 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-14900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i9-14900KF
- Performs up to 23% better in Deathloop than Core i5-2400S - 206 vs 168 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-2400S - 32 vs 4 threads
Deathloop
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
FPS
168
82%
Value, €/FPS
€0.32/FPS
100%
Price, €
€54.05
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €54.05 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 297 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
206
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.83/FPS
17%
Price, €
€376.23
14%
FPS Winner
Buy for €376.23 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 297 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-2400S | vs | Core i9-14900KF |
---|---|---|
Jan 9th, 2011 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Intel HD 2000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |