Key Differences
In short — Core i5-14400F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-13100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-13100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-14400F is 369 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-13100.
Advantages of Core i5-14400F
- Performs up to 2% better in Rust than Core i3-13100 - 239 vs 234 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-13100 - 16 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Core i3-13100
- Up to 24% cheaper than Core i5-14400F - $112.60 vs $148.64
- Up to 23% better value when playing Rust than Core i5-14400F - $0.48 vs $0.62 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-14400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
239
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.62/FPS
77%
Price, €
€148.64
75%
FPS Winner
Buy for €148.64 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5058 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
234
98%
Value, €/FPS
€0.48/FPS
100%
Price, €
€112.6
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €112.6 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5059 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-14400F | vs | Core i3-13100 |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 60 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 |
No | Overclockable | No |