Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900KF outperforms the cheaper Core i5-14400 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-14400 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-12900KF is 795 days older than the cheaper Core i5-14400.
Advantages of Core i5-14400
- Up to 22% cheaper than Core i9-12900KF - $170.42 vs $219.10
- Up to 21% better value when playing Ready or Not than Core i9-12900KF - $0.65 vs $0.82 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-12900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i9-12900KF
- Performs up to 1% better in Ready or Not than Core i5-14400 - 295 vs 293 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-14400 - 24 vs 16 threads
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
293
99%
Value, €/FPS
€0.65/FPS
100%
Price, €
€189.17
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €189.17 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 127 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
295
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.82/FPS
79%
Price, €
€243.2
77%
FPS Winner
Buy for €243.2 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 127 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-14400 | vs | Core i9-12900KF |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 16 |
16 | Threads | 24 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 125 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
UHD Graphics 730 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |