Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13600K outperforms the cheaper Core i7-3770 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-3770 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13600K is 3803 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-3770.
Advantages of Core i5-13600K
- Performs up to 20% better in Elden Ring than Core i7-3770 - 136 vs 113 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3770 - 20 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Core i7-3770
- Up to 72% cheaper than Core i5-13600K - $58.36 vs $207.21
- Up to 66% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i5-13600K - $0.52 vs $1.52 per FPS
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than Intel Core i5-13600K - 77 vs 125 Watts
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
136
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.52/FPS
34%
Price, €
€207.21
28%
FPS Winner
Buy for €207.21 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 334 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
FPS
113
83%
Value, €/FPS
€0.52/FPS
100%
Price, €
€58.36
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €58.36 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 334 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-13600K | vs | Core i7-3770 |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
14 | Cores | 4 |
20 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
5.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 77 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4000 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |