The Core i5-13600K is a slightly faster gaming CPU than the Core i5-14400, however, it's the same value for money, as it's $15.70 more expensive!
Advantages of the Core i5-13600K
- A slightly faster CPU for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 20 vs 16 threads
Advantages of the Core i5-14400
- Up to 8% cheaper – $180.17 vs $195.87
Core i5-13600K vs Core i5-14400 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i5-13600K
Sep 27th, 2022
Average FPS
214
100%
Min 1% FPS
141
100%
Price, €
€195.87
91%
Value, €/FPS
€0.91/FPS
96%
Core i5-14400
Jan 8th, 2024
Average FPS
207
97%
Min 1% FPS
136
96%
Price, €
€180.17
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.87/FPS
100%
Core i5-13600K vs Core i5-14400 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-13600K vs Core i5-14400 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-13600K vs Core i5-14400 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-13600K
Sep 27th, 2022
Cores
14-core
100%
L3 Cache
24 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.1 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Core i5-14400
Jan 8th, 2024
Cores
10-core
71%
L3 Cache
20 MB
83%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
71%
Turbo Frequency
4.7 GHz
92%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
86%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i5-13600K | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i5-14400 |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
$319.00 | MSRP | $221.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
125 W | Power Consumption | Not Available |
Performance | ||
14 | Cores | 10 |
20 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Frequency | 2.5 GHz |
5.1 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 4.7 GHz |
24 MB | L3 Cache | 20 MB |
Other Features | ||
DDR4 @ 3200 MHz, DDR5 @ 5600 MHz | RAM | DDR4 @ 3200 MHz, DDR5 @ 4800 MHz |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |