Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-13900KF outperforms the more expensive Core i5-13400F on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-13900KF is 99 days older than the more expensive Core i5-13400F.
Advantages of Core i9-13900KF
- Performs up to 28% better in Immortals of Aveum than Core i5-13400F - 102 vs 80 FPS
- Up to 53% cheaper than Core i5-13400F - $323.84 vs $689.87
- Up to 63% better value when playing Immortals of Aveum than Core i5-13400F - $3.52 vs $9.57 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-13400F - 32 vs 16 threads
Immortals of Aveum
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €765.76 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1549 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
102
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.52/FPS
100%
Price, €
€359.46
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €359.46 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1549 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-13400F | vs | Core i9-13900KF |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 24 |
16 | Threads | 32 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 125 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |