The Core i5-13400 is a clear winner – it's at least 2x faster gaming CPU than the FX-8120 and it's also a much better value for money, as it's only $94.57 more expensive!
Advantages of the Core i5-13400
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- A much better value for money for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 16 vs 8 threads
Advantages of the FX-8120
- Up to 57% cheaper – $70.29 vs $164.86
Core i5-13400 vs FX-8120 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i5-13400
Jan 4th, 2023
Average FPS
205
100%
Min 1% FPS
135
100%
Price, €
€164.86
42%
Value, €/FPS
€0.8/FPS
52%
Core i5-13400 vs FX-8120 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-13400 vs FX-8120 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-13400 vs FX-8120 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-13400
Jan 4th, 2023
Cores
10-core
100%
L3 Cache
20 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
81%
Turbo Frequency
4.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
FX-8120
Oct 12th, 2011
Cores
8-core
80%
L3 Cache
8 MB
40%
Base Frequency
3.1 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.4 GHz
74%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i5-13400 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | FX-8120 |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
$221.00 | MSRP | Not Available |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Zambezi |
Not Available | Power Consumption | 125 W |
Performance | ||
10 | Cores | 8 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
2.5 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.1 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 3.4 GHz |
20 MB | L3 Cache | 8 MB |
Other Features | ||
DDR4 @ 3200 MHz, DDR5 @ 4800 MHz | RAM | DDR3 |
UHD Graphics 730 | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
No | Overclockable | Yes |