Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900F outperforms Core i5-12400T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-14900F is 728 days newer than Core i5-12400T.
Advantages of Core i5-12400T
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-14900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i9-14900F
- Performs up to 14% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i5-12400T - 134 vs 118 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-12400T - 32 vs 12 threads
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
134
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.35/FPS
100%
Price, €
€449.08
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €449.08 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 39 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 10th, 2022
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-12400T | vs | Core i9-14900F |
---|---|---|
Jan 10th, 2022 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 24 |
12 | Threads | 32 |
1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | Not Available |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
UHD Graphics 730 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |