Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900KF outperforms the cheaper Core i5-12400F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-12400F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-12900KF is 61 days older than the cheaper Core i5-12400F.
Advantages of Core i5-12400F
- Up to 59% cheaper than Core i9-12900KF - $90.37 vs $219.21
- Up to 56% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i9-12900KF - $0.69 vs $1.58 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-12900KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Core i9-12900KF
- Performs up to 5% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i5-12400F - 154 vs 146 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-12400F - 24 vs 12 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
146
95%
Value, €/FPS
€0.69/FPS
100%
Price, €
€100.31
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €100.31 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 0 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
154
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.58/FPS
44%
Price, €
€243.32
41%
FPS Winner
Buy for €243.32 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 0 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-12400F | vs | Core i9-12900KF |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 16 |
12 | Threads | 24 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |