Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900K outperforms the cheaper Core i5-12400 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-12400 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900K is 266 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-12400.
Advantages of Core i5-12400
- Up to 69% cheaper than Core i9-13900K - $116.52 vs $372.53
- Up to 66% better value when playing DOOM Eternal than Core i9-13900K - $0.25 vs $0.74 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900K - 65 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Core i9-13900K
- Performs up to 7% better in DOOM Eternal than Core i5-12400 - 558 vs 522 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-12400 - 32 vs 12 threads
DOOM Eternal
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Nightmare
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
522
94%
Value, €/FPS
€0.25/FPS
100%
Price, €
€129.34
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €129.34 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
558
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.74/FPS
34%
Price, €
€413.51
31%
FPS Winner
Buy for €413.51 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Nightmare
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-12400 | vs | Core i9-13900K |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 24 |
12 | Threads | 32 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
UHD Graphics 730 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |