Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900K outperforms the cheaper Core i5-11600KF on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-11600KF is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-12900K is 233 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-11600KF.
Advantages of Core i5-11600KF
- Up to 46% cheaper than Core i9-12900K - $135.14 vs $251.35
- Up to 46% better value when playing Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i9-12900K - $0.82 vs $1.51 per FPS
Advantages of Core i9-12900K
- Performs up to 1% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i5-11600KF - 166 vs 164 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-11600KF - 24 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
164
99%
Value, €/FPS
€0.82/FPS
100%
Price, €
€135.14
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €135.14 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6833 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
166
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.51/FPS
54%
Price, €
€251.35
53%
FPS Winner
Buy for €251.35 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6833 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-11600KF | vs | Core i9-12900K |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 16 |
12 | Threads | 24 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |