Key Differences
In short — Core i5-14400F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-11600KF on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-11600KF is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-14400F is 1028 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-11600KF.
Advantages of Core i5-11600KF
- Up to 9% cheaper than Core i5-14400F - $135.14 vs $148.64
- Up to 8% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i5-14400F - $1.04 vs $1.13 per FPS
Advantages of Core i5-14400F
- Performs up to 2% better in Elden Ring than Core i5-11600KF - 132 vs 130 FPS
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
130
98%
Value, €/FPS
€1.04/FPS
100%
Price, €
€135.14
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €135.14 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5318 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
132
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.13/FPS
92%
Price, €
€148.64
90%
FPS Winner
Buy for €148.64 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5317 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-11600KF | vs | Core i5-14400F |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 10 |
12 | Threads | 16 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
125 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |