In Battlefield 6, the Core i5-11600K is faster than the Core i7-10700K and it's also a much better value for money, as it's $182 cheaper!
Core i5-11600K
- Up to 15% faster in Battlefield 6 – 99 vs 86 FPS
- Up to 15% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 10 months and 15 days newer – Mar 16, 2021 vs Apr 30, 2020
- Is 10 months and 15 days newer
- Up to 48% cheaper – $199.00 vs $380.99
- Up to 48% cheaper
- Up to 55% better value in Battlefield 6 – $2.01 vs $4.43/FPS
- Up to 55% better value in Battlefield 6
Core i7-10700K
No clear advantages
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Core i5-11600K vs Core i7-10700K: Comparison of performance and price
Core i5-11600K
Mar 16th, 2021
Average FPS
99 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
74 FPS
100%
Price, $
$199
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.01/FPS
100%
Core i7-10700K
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
86 FPS
87%
Min 1% FPS
65 FPS
88%
Price, $
$380.99
52%
Value, $/FPS
$4.43/FPS
45%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-11600K vs Core i7-10700K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-11600K vs Core i7-10700K in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-11600K
Mar 16th, 2021
Cores
6-core
75%
L3 Cache
12 MB
75%
Base Frequency
3.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.9 GHz
96%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Core i7-10700K
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.8 GHz
97%
Turbo Frequency
5.1 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
92%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-11600K Mar 16th, 2021 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-10700K Apr 30th, 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Mar 16th, 2021 | Released | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| $262.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1200 | Socket | LGA1200 |
| 125 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 2933 MHz (DDR4) |
| UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 630 |
| Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
