Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-11400 outperforms the more expensive Core i9-10850K on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-11400 is 232 days newer than the more expensive Core i9-10850K.
Advantages of Core i5-11400
- Performs up to 3% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Core i9-10850K - 330 vs 320 FPS
- Up to 57% cheaper than Core i9-10850K - $126.12 vs $292.79
- Up to 58% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than Core i9-10850K - $0.38 vs $0.91 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-10850K - 65 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Core i9-10850K
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-11400 - 20 vs 12 threads
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
330
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.38/FPS
100%
Price, €
€126.12
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €126.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 398 minutes ago
Buy for €292.79 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 398 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-11400 | vs | Core i9-10850K |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jul 27th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 10 |
12 | Threads | 20 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
UHD Graphics 730 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |