Key Differences
In short — Core i5-14400F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-11400 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-11400 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-14400F is 1028 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-11400.
Advantages of Core i5-11400
- Up to 15% cheaper than Core i5-14400F - $126.12 vs $148.62
- Up to 11% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Core i5-14400F - $0.70 vs $0.79 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-14400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i5-14400F
- Performs up to 4% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Core i5-11400 - 188 vs 181 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-11400 - 16 vs 12 threads
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
181
96%
Value, €/FPS
€0.7/FPS
100%
Price, €
€126.12
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €126.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 435 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
188
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.79/FPS
89%
Price, €
€148.62
84%
FPS Winner
Buy for €148.62 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 434 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-11400 | vs | Core i5-14400F |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 10 |
12 | Threads | 16 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
UHD Graphics 730 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |