Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900KF outperforms the cheaper Core i5-10600KF on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-10600KF is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900KF is 1265 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-10600KF.
Advantages of Core i5-10600KF
- Up to 73% cheaper than Core i9-14900KF - $95.77 vs $351.41
- Up to 62% better value when playing Starfield than Core i9-14900KF - $1.69 vs $4.48 per FPS
Advantages of Core i9-14900KF
- Performs up to 38% better in Starfield than Core i5-10600KF - 87 vs 63 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-10600KF - 32 vs 12 threads
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
63
72%
Value, €/FPS
€1.69/FPS
100%
Price, €
€106.31
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €106.31 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 114 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
87
100%
Value, €/FPS
€4.48/FPS
38%
Price, €
€390.07
27%
FPS Winner
Buy for €390.07 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 113 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-10600KF | vs | Core i9-14900KF |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 24 |
12 | Threads | 32 |
4.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
125 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
41.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |