The Core i5-10600K is a clear winner – it's at least 2x faster gaming CPU than the FX-8320E and it's also a much better value for money, as it's $26.16 cheaper!
Advantages of the Core i5-10600K
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Up to 16% cheaper – $134.22 vs $160.38
- A much better value for money for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of the FX-8320E
The Core i5-10600K is better in every way
Core i5-10600K vs FX-8320E for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i5-10600K
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
192
100%
Min 1% FPS
127
100%
Price, €
€134.22
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.69/FPS
100%
Core i5-10600K vs FX-8320E in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-10600K vs FX-8320E in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-10600K vs FX-8320E in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-10600K
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
6-core
75%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
4.1 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
FX-8320E
Sep 2nd, 2014
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
67%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
78%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
83%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
70%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i5-10600K | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | FX-8320E |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Sep 2nd, 2014 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $147.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
| Comet Lake | Codename | Vishera |
| 95 W | Power Consumption | 95 W |
| Performance | ||
| 6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
4.1 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.2 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 4.0 GHz |
12 MB | L3 Cache | 8 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR4 @ 2666 MHz | RAM | DDR3 @ 1866 MHz |
| UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
