Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-10500 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-10500 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13400F is 979 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-10500.
Advantages of Core i5-10500
- Up to 82% cheaper than Core i5-13400F - $135.14 vs $765.76
- Up to 80% better value when playing Minecraft than Core i5-13400F - $0.19 vs $0.94 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-13400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 13% better in Minecraft than Core i5-10500 - 813 vs 719 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-10500 - 16 vs 12 threads
Minecraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
719
88%
Value, €/FPS
€0.19/FPS
100%
Price, €
€135.14
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €135.14 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7390 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
813
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.94/FPS
20%
Price, €
€765.76
17%
FPS Winner
Buy for €765.76 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7389 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-10500 | vs | Core i5-13400F |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 10 |
12 | Threads | 16 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |