In Battlefield 6, the Core i5-10400H is slightly faster than the Ryzen 3 2200G. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i5-10400H
- Up to 12% faster in Battlefield 6 – 74 vs 66 FPS
- Up to 12% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 2 years and 1 month newer – Apr 02, 2020 vs Feb 12, 2018
- Is 2 years and 1 month newer
- Consumes up to 31% less energy – 45 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 31% less energy
Ryzen 3 2200G
No clear advantages
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Core i5-10400H vs Ryzen 3 2200G: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Ryzen 3 2200G
Feb 12th, 2018
Average FPS
66 FPS
89%
Min 1% FPS
50 FPS
91%
Price, $
$65.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.99/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-10400H vs Ryzen 3 2200G in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-10400H vs Ryzen 3 2200G in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-10400H
Apr 2nd, 2020
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.6 GHz
74%
Turbo Frequency
4.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
100%
Ryzen 3 2200G
Feb 12th, 2018
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
4 MB
67%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.7 GHz
80%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-10400H Apr 2nd, 2020 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 3 2200G Feb 12th, 2018 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Apr 2nd, 2020 | Released | Feb 12th, 2018 |
| – | MSRP | $99.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | AM4 |
45 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2933 MHz (DDR3), 2933 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 2933 MHz (DDR4) |
| UHD Graphics | Integrated GPU | Radeon Vega 8 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
