Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X outperforms the cheaper Core i5-10400F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-10400F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X is 880 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-10400F.
Advantages of Core i5-10400F
- Up to 72% cheaper than Ryzen 9 7950X - $112.82 vs $406.37
- Up to 68% better value when playing DOOM Eternal than Ryzen 9 7950X - $0.26 vs $0.81 per FPS
- Consumes up to 62% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7950X - 65 vs 170 Watts
Advantages of Ryzen 9 7950X
- Performs up to 14% better in DOOM Eternal than Core i5-10400F - 557 vs 490 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-10400F - 32 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-10400F doesn't have integrated graphics
DOOM Eternal
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Nightmare
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
490
88%
Value, €/FPS
€0.26/FPS
100%
Price, €
€125.23
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €125.23 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 170 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
557
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.81/FPS
32%
Price, €
€451.07
27%
FPS Winner
Buy for €451.07 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 169 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Nightmare
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-10400F | vs | Ryzen 9 7950X |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 16 |
12 | Threads | 32 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.7 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 170 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 45.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |