Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900KF outperforms the cheaper Core i5-10400F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-10400F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-12900KF is 553 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-10400F.
Advantages of Core i5-10400F
- Up to 49% cheaper than Core i9-12900KF - $112.82 vs $219.21
- Up to 34% better value when playing Cyberpunk 2077 than Core i9-12900KF - $1.63 vs $2.46 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-12900KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Core i9-12900KF
- Performs up to 29% better in Cyberpunk 2077 than Core i5-10400F - 99 vs 77 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-10400F - 24 vs 12 threads
Cyberpunk 2077
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
RT Overdrive
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
77
78%
Value, €/FPS
€1.63/FPS
100%
Price, €
€125.23
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €125.23 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 73 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
99
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.46/FPS
66%
Price, €
€243.32
51%
FPS Winner
Buy for €243.32 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 72 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
RT Overdrive
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-10400F | vs | Core i9-12900KF |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 16 |
12 | Threads | 24 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |