Key Differences
In short — Core i7-9700KF outperforms the cheaper Core i5-10400F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-10400F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-9700KF is 478 days older than the cheaper Core i5-10400F.
Advantages of Core i5-10400F
- Up to 33% cheaper than Core i7-9700KF - $135.09 vs $202.70
- Up to 33% better value when playing Mass Effect: Andromeda than Core i7-9700KF - $0.62 vs $0.92 per FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i7-9700KF - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-9700KF - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Core i7-9700KF
- Performs up to 1% better in Mass Effect: Andromeda than Core i5-10400F - 220 vs 217 FPS
Mass Effect: Andromeda
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
217
99%
Value, €/FPS
€0.62/FPS
100%
Price, €
€135.09
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €135.09 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 51 minutes ago
Buy for €202.7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 50 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-10400F | vs | Core i7-9700KF |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |