Key Differences
In short — Core i7-13700KF outperforms the cheaper Core i5-10400F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-10400F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-13700KF is 880 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-10400F.
Advantages of Core i5-10400F
- Up to 44% cheaper than Core i7-13700KF - $135.09 vs $240.22
- Up to 42% better value when playing Control than Core i7-13700KF - $0.67 vs $1.15 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i7-13700KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Core i7-13700KF
- Performs up to 3% better in Control than Core i5-10400F - 208 vs 202 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-10400F - 24 vs 12 threads
Control
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
202
97%
Value, €/FPS
€0.67/FPS
100%
Price, €
€135.09
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €135.09 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 238 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
208
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.15/FPS
58%
Price, €
€240.22
56%
FPS Winner
Buy for €240.22 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 241 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-10400F | vs | Core i7-13700KF |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 16 |
12 | Threads | 24 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |