The Core i5-1030NG7 is at least 2x faster gaming CPU than the Phenom X4 9650. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Core i5-1030NG7
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Consumes up to 89% less energy – 10 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of the Phenom X4 9650
The Core i5-1030NG7 is better in every way
Core i5-1030NG7 vs Phenom X4 9650 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i5-1030NG7
Mar 18th, 2020
Average FPS
184
100%
Min 1% FPS
122
100%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Phenom X4 9650
Mar 27th, 2008
Average FPS
163
89%
Min 1% FPS
110
90%
Price, €
€17.97
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.11/FPS
100%
Core i5-1030NG7 vs Phenom X4 9650 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-1030NG7 vs Phenom X4 9650 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-1030NG7 vs Phenom X4 9650 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-1030NG7
Mar 18th, 2020
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
1.1 GHz
48%
Turbo Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Phenom X4 9650
Mar 27th, 2008
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
2 MB
33%
Base Frequency
2.3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. unknown RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i5-1030NG7 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Phenom X4 9650 |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Mar 18th, 2020 | Release Date | Mar 27th, 2008 |
Not Available | MSRP | Not Available |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
Intel BGA 1044 | Socket | AMD Socket AM2+ |
Ice Lake | Codename | Agena |
10 W | Power Consumption | 95 W |
Performance | ||
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
1.1 GHz | Base Frequency | 2.3 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Frequency | Non-Turbo |
6 MB | L3 Cache | 2 MB |
Other Features | ||
DDR4 @ 3200 MHz | RAM | unknown |
Iris Plus (64EU) | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
No | Overclockable | No |