The Core i3-9300 is the comparison's loser – it's a slightly slower gaming CPU than the Celeron G6900 and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's $89.18 more expensive!
Advantages of the Core i3-9300
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of the Celeron G6900
- A faster CPU for gaming
- Up to 66% cheaper – $45.04 vs $134.22
- A much better value for money for gaming
Core i3-9300 vs Celeron G6900 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i3-9300
Apr 23rd, 2019
Average FPS
188
98%
Min 1% FPS
124
98%
Price, €
€134.22
33%
Value, €/FPS
€0.71/FPS
32%
Celeron G6900
Jan 4th, 2022
Average FPS
192
100%
Min 1% FPS
127
100%
Price, €
€45.04
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.23/FPS
100%
Core i3-9300 vs Celeron G6900 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-9300 vs Celeron G6900 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-9300 vs Celeron G6900 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-9300
Apr 23rd, 2019
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
50%
Celeron G6900
Jan 4th, 2022
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
4 MB
50%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
92%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i3-9300 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Celeron G6900 |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
$143.00 | MSRP | $52.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
62 W | Power Consumption | Not Available |
Performance | ||
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.7 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.4 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Frequency | Non-Turbo |
8 MB | L3 Cache | 4 MB |
Other Features | ||
DDR4 @ 2400 MHz | RAM | DDR4 @ 3200 MHz, DDR5 @ 4800 MHz |
UHD 630 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 710 |
No | Overclockable | No |