The Core i3-9100T is a clear winner – it's at least 2x faster gaming CPU than the FX-4130 and it's also a better value for money, as it's only $42.33 more expensive!
Advantages of the Core i3-9100T
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- A better value for money for gaming
- Consumes up to 72% less energy – 35 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of the FX-4130
- Up to 47% cheaper – $46.86 vs $89.19
Core i3-9100T vs FX-4130 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i3-9100T
Sep 1st, 2018
Average FPS
182
100%
Min 1% FPS
121
100%
Price, €
€89.19
52%
Value, €/FPS
€0.49/FPS
57%
Core i3-9100T vs FX-4130 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-9100T vs FX-4130 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-9100T vs FX-4130 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-9100T
Sep 1st, 2018
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.1 GHz
82%
Turbo Frequency
3.7 GHz
95%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
100%
FX-4130
Aug 27th, 2012
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
4 MB
67%
Base Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
78%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i3-9100T | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | FX-4130 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Sep 1st, 2018 | Release Date | Aug 27th, 2012 |
| $122.00 | MSRP | $112.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
| Coffee Lake | Codename | Zambezi |
35 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Performance | ||
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
| 4 | Threads | 4 |
| 3.1 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.8 GHz |
| 3.7 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 3.9 GHz |
6 MB | L3 Cache | 4 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR4 @ 2400 MHz | RAM | DDR3 @ 1866 MHz |
| UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
