Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900KF outperforms the cheaper Core i3-9100T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-9100T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-12900KF is 1160 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-9100T.
Advantages of Core i3-9100T
- Up to 61% cheaper than Core i9-12900KF - $89.19 vs $228.83
- Up to 47% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i9-12900KF - $0.17 vs $0.32 per FPS
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than Intel Core i9-12900KF - 35 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-12900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i9-12900KF
- Performs up to 32% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i3-9100T - 706 vs 533 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-9100T - 24 vs 4 threads
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2018
FPS
533
75%
Value, €/FPS
€0.17/FPS
100%
Price, €
€89.19
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €89.19 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7267 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
706
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.32/FPS
53%
Price, €
€228.83
38%
FPS Winner
Buy for €228.83 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7267 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2018
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-9100T | vs | Core i9-12900KF |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2018 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |