Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 3600 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-9100F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-9100F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 3600 is 75 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-9100F.
Advantages of Core i3-9100F
- Up to 26% cheaper than Ryzen 5 3600 - $56.81 vs $76.29
- Up to 24% better value when playing Elden Ring than Ryzen 5 3600 - $0.52 vs $0.68 per FPS
Advantages of Ryzen 5 3600
- Performs up to 2% better in Elden Ring than Core i3-9100F - 124 vs 121 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-9100F - 12 vs 4 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
121
98%
Value, €/FPS
€0.52/FPS
100%
Price, €
€63.06
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €63.06 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 285 minutes ago
Buy for €84.68 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 284 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-9100F | vs | Ryzen 5 3600 |
---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |