Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-12100F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-9100F on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-12100F is 1008 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-9100F.
Advantages of Core i3-9100F
- Up to 9% cheaper than Core i3-12100F - $63.06 vs $69.19
Advantages of Core i3-12100F
- Performs up to 24% better in Starfield than Core i3-9100F - 72 vs 58 FPS
- Up to 12% better value when playing Starfield than Core i3-9100F - $0.96 vs $1.09 per FPS
- Consumes up to 11% less energy than Intel Core i3-9100F - 58 vs 65 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-9100F - 8 vs 4 threads
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €63.06 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7252 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
FPS
72
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.96/FPS
100%
Price, €
€69.19
91%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €69.19 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7252 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-9100F | vs | Core i3-12100F |
---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 25th, 2022 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 58 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |