Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900KF outperforms the cheaper Core i3-9100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-9100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-12900KF is 1160 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-9100.
Advantages of Core i3-9100
- Up to 72% cheaper than Core i9-12900KF - $60.87 vs $219.10
- Up to 70% better value when playing Mass Effect: Andromeda than Core i9-12900KF - $0.31 vs $1.02 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-12900KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-12900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i9-12900KF
- Performs up to 10% better in Mass Effect: Andromeda than Core i3-9100 - 238 vs 216 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-9100 - 24 vs 4 threads
Mass Effect: Andromeda
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2018
FPS
216
91%
Value, €/FPS
€0.31/FPS
100%
Price, €
€67.57
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €67.57 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 59 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
238
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.02/FPS
30%
Price, €
€243.2
27%
FPS Winner
Buy for €243.2 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 63 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2018
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-9100 | vs | Core i9-12900KF |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2018 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |