Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-9100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-9100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13400F is 1586 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-9100.
Advantages of Core i3-9100
- Up to 92% cheaper than Core i5-13400F - $60.87 vs $730.45
- Up to 91% better value when playing Deathloop than Core i5-13400F - $0.38 vs $4.25 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-13400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 8% better in Deathloop than Core i3-9100 - 191 vs 177 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-9100 - 16 vs 4 threads
Deathloop
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2018
FPS
177
93%
Value, €/FPS
€0.38/FPS
100%
Price, €
€67.57
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €67.57 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 119 minutes ago
Buy for €810.8 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 118 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2018
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-9100 | vs | Core i5-13400F |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2018 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |