Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X3D outperforms Core i3-8300 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X3D is 1785 days newer than Core i3-8300.
Advantages of Core i3-8300
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D - 62 vs 120 Watts
Advantages of Ryzen 9 7950X3D
- Performs up to 20% better in Battlefield IV than Core i3-8300 - 490 vs 410 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-8300 - 32 vs 4 threads
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
490
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.37/FPS
100%
Price, €
€671.13
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €671.13 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7386 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Feb 14th, 2018
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-8300 | vs | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
---|---|---|
Feb 14th, 2018 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.7 GHz |
62 W | TDP | 120 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |