In Battlefield 6, the Core i3-8109U is quite a bit slower than the Core i7-14700F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-8109U
- Consumes up to 57% less energy – 28 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 57% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i7-14700F
- Up to 81% faster in Battlefield 6 – 125 vs 69 FPS
- Up to 81% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 5 years and 9 months newer – Jan 08, 2024 vs Apr 05, 2018
- Is 5 years and 9 months newer
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Core i3-8109U vs Core i7-14700F: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i7-14700F
Jan 8th, 2024
Average FPS
125 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
94 FPS
100%
Price, $
$302.97
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.42/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-8109U vs Core i7-14700F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-8109U vs Core i7-14700F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-8109U
Apr 5th, 2018
Cores
2-core
10%
L3 Cache
4 MB
12%
Base Frequency
3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.6 GHz
67%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i7-14700F
Jan 8th, 2024
Cores
20-core
100%
L3 Cache
33 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.1 GHz
70%
Turbo Frequency
5.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-8109U Apr 5th, 2018 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-14700F Jan 8th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Apr 5th, 2018 | Released | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| – | MSRP | $359.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1356 | Socket | LGA1700 |
28 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR4 | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
Iris Pro Plus | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
