Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KF outperforms Core i3-8100T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900KF is 1639 days newer than Core i3-8100T.
Advantages of Core i3-8100T
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KF - 35 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i9-13900KF
- Performs up to 8% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i3-8100T - 168 vs 156 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-8100T - 32 vs 4 threads
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
168
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.49/FPS
100%
Price, €
€417.64
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €417.64 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 265 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-8100T | vs | Core i9-13900KF |
---|---|---|
Apr 2nd, 2018 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |