Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 3700X outperforms the cheaper Core i3-7100T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-7100T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 7 3700X is 915 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-7100T.
Advantages of Core i3-7100T
- Up to 45% cheaper than Ryzen 7 3700X - $63.44 vs $114.41
- Up to 41% better value when playing Hogwarts Legacy than Ryzen 7 3700X - $0.76 vs $1.29 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 3700X - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 3700X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Ryzen 7 3700X
- Performs up to 6% better in Hogwarts Legacy than Core i3-7100T - 89 vs 84 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-7100T - 16 vs 4 threads
Hogwarts Legacy
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
84
94%
Value, €/FPS
€0.76/FPS
100%
Price, €
€63.44
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €63.44 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6830 minutes ago
Buy for €114.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6830 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-7100T | vs | Ryzen 7 3700X |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |