Key Differences
In short — Core i7-14700F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-7100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-7100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-14700F is 2561 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-7100.
Advantages of Core i3-7100
- Up to 83% cheaper than Core i7-14700F - $38.52 vs $221.72
- Up to 80% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i7-14700F - $0.36 vs $1.80 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-14700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i7-14700F
- Performs up to 14% better in Elden Ring than Core i3-7100 - 137 vs 120 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-7100 - 28 vs 4 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
120
88%
Value, €/FPS
€0.36/FPS
100%
Price, €
€42.76
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €42.76 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 667 minutes ago
Buy for €246.11 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 665 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-7100 | vs | Core i7-14700F |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 20 |
4 | Threads | 28 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
51 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
Intel HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |