Key Differences
In short — Core i7-13700K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-7100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-7100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-13700K is 2093 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-7100.
Advantages of Core i3-7100
- Up to 85% cheaper than Core i7-13700K - $38.52 vs $251.60
- Up to 82% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i7-13700K - $0.36 vs $2.02 per FPS
- Consumes up to 59% less energy than Intel Core i7-13700K - 51 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Core i7-13700K
- Performs up to 15% better in Elden Ring than Core i3-7100 - 138 vs 120 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-7100 - 24 vs 4 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
120
87%
Value, €/FPS
€0.36/FPS
100%
Price, €
€42.76
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €42.76 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 96 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
138
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.02/FPS
18%
Price, €
€279.28
15%
FPS Winner
Buy for €279.28 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 95 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-7100 | vs | Core i7-13700K |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 16 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |