The Core i3-6300 is the comparison's loser – it's a slightly slower gaming CPU than the Core i5-4670K and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's $37.28 more expensive!
Advantages of the Core i3-6300
- Consumes up to 39% less energy – 51 vs 84 Watts
Advantages of the Core i5-4670K
- A slightly faster CPU for gaming
- Up to 38% cheaper – $60.65 vs $97.93
- A better value for money for gaming
Core i3-6300 vs Core i5-4670K for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i3-6300
Sep 1st, 2015
Average FPS
183
100%
Min 1% FPS
121
99%
Price, €
€97.93
61%
Value, €/FPS
€0.53/FPS
62%
Core i5-4670K
Jun 2nd, 2013
Average FPS
183
100%
Min 1% FPS
122
100%
Price, €
€60.65
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.33/FPS
100%
Core i3-6300 vs Core i5-4670K in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-6300 vs Core i5-4670K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-6300 vs Core i5-4670K in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-6300
Sep 1st, 2015
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
4 MB
67%
Base Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
100%
Core i5-4670K
Jun 2nd, 2013
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
89%
Turbo Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i3-6300 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i5-4670K |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Jun 2nd, 2013 |
Not Available | MSRP | Not Available |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Skylake | Codename | Haswell |
51 W | Power Consumption | 84 W |
Performance | ||
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.8 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Frequency | 3.8 GHz |
4 MB | L3 Cache | 6 MB |
Other Features | ||
DDR4 @ 2133 MHz | RAM | DDR3 |
Intel HD 530 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |