Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12400 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-6100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-6100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-12400 is 2317 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-6100.
Advantages of Core i3-6100
- Up to 69% cheaper than Core i5-12400 - $36.61 vs $116.50
- Up to 64% better value when playing No Man's Sky than Core i5-12400 - $0.24 vs $0.67 per FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Core i5-12400 - 51 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Core i5-12400
- Performs up to 14% better in No Man's Sky than Core i3-6100 - 193 vs 170 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-6100 - 12 vs 4 threads
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
170
88%
Value, €/FPS
€0.24/FPS
100%
Price, €
€40.64
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €40.64 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 40 minutes ago
Buy for €129.32 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 46 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-6100 | vs | Core i5-12400 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Skylake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
Intel HD 530 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 |
No | Overclockable | No |