Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900KF outperforms the cheaper Core i3-540 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-540 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-12900KF is 4319 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-540.
Advantages of Core i3-540
- Up to 87% cheaper than Core i9-12900KF - $28.41 vs $219.14
- Up to 83% better value when playing No Man's Sky than Core i9-12900KF - $0.20 vs $1.20 per FPS
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than Intel Core i9-12900KF - 73 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-12900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i9-12900KF
- Performs up to 29% better in No Man's Sky than Core i3-540 - 202 vs 156 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-540 - 24 vs 4 threads
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €31.53 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 222 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
202
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.2/FPS
17%
Price, €
€243.24
12%
FPS Winner
Buy for €243.24 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 223 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 7th, 2010
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-540 | vs | Core i9-12900KF |
---|---|---|
Jan 7th, 2010 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Clarkdale | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 16 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
73 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |