The Core i3-5015U is a much slower gaming CPU than the Ryzen 3 3200G. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Core i3-5015U
- Consumes up to 77% less energy – 15 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of the Ryzen 3 3200G
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
Core i3-5015U vs Ryzen 3 3200G for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i3-5015U
Mar 1st, 2015
Average FPS
172
96%
Min 1% FPS
115
97%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Ryzen 3 3200G
Jul 7th, 2019
Average FPS
179
100%
Min 1% FPS
119
100%
Price, €
€67.5
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.37/FPS
100%
Core i3-5015U vs Ryzen 3 3200G in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-5015U vs Ryzen 3 3200G in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-5015U vs Ryzen 3 3200G in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-5015U
Mar 1st, 2015
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
3 MB
75%
Base Frequency
2.1 GHz
58%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
100%
Ryzen 3 3200G
Jul 7th, 2019
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
4 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i3-5015U | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Ryzen 3 3200G |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Mar 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
| $275.00 | MSRP | Not Available |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1168 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
| Broadwell-U | Codename | Picasso |
15 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Performance | ||
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 4 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.1 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.6 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Frequency | 4.0 GHz |
| 3 MB | L3 Cache | 4 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 @ 1600 MHz | RAM | DDR4 |
| Intel HD 5500 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
