Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 5700X outperforms the cheaper Core i3-4160 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-4160 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 7 5700X is 2814 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-4160.
Advantages of Core i3-4160
- Up to 86% cheaper than Ryzen 7 5700X - $18.01 vs $130.02
- Up to 85% better value when playing The Last of Us Part I than Ryzen 7 5700X - $0.14 vs $0.92 per FPS
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 5700X - 54 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 5700X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Ryzen 7 5700X
- Performs up to 8% better in The Last of Us Part I than Core i3-4160 - 142 vs 132 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4160 - 16 vs 4 threads
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
FPS
132
93%
Value, €/FPS
€0.14/FPS
100%
Price, €
€18.01
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €18.01 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6618 minutes ago
Buy for €130.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6617 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Desktop • Apr 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-4160 | vs | Ryzen 7 5700X |
---|---|---|
Jul 21st, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 4th, 2022 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Haswell | Codename | Vermeer |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |